What does Bukhari have to do with reason?

Is Bukhari merely a narrator? A writer who tracks down stories and news from the mouths of men here and there, then records them without regard for reason or knowledge.

Is Bukhari merely a man of transmission, with no connection to criticism or reason?

These are repeated accusations, but they confirm that those who repeat them are unaware of what is going on in their heads.

These are merely rhetorical statements that indicate that the speaker belongs to a coma that does not know who Bukhari is or what he created. If Bukhari were as they say, he would have fallen centuries ago, along with Sahih Bukhari, just as the Bible was brought down by the true, creative critics of Europe.

Since Bukhari did not fall, but rather, failure and failure are inevitable—and continue to haunt his critics—then where is the fault, and where is the problem?!

There is a phrase attributed to Einstein that says: "Insanity is doing the same thing over and over again, in the same manner, with the same steps, and expecting a different result." Bukhari's critics repeat the same thing not once or twice, but hundreds of times, in the same manner, and with the same steps, and then they get the same result: (failure)... and this booklet reveals that.