The invasion of Kuwait by Iraqi troops on 2 August 1990 triggered a large-scale military operation conducted by Washington as well as a huge media campaign. This study seeks to compare the American press with the British press during the Gulf Crisis and War.
The main objective is to examine the journalistic discourse of opinion as developed by newspapers belonging to the so-called quality press and deconstruct the ways in which this discourse was developed. This raises questions about the language adopted by editorialists and journalists and in particular about the way in which the Other - enemy and allies - and the Self - the USA and the UK - were described by the American daily papers, the <i>New York Times</i> and the <i>Washington Post</i> and the British daily papers, the <i>Times</i> and the <i>Guardian</i> and the Sunday newspapers, the <i>Sunday Times</i> and the <i>Observer</i> during the crisis and the war.
The study is based on a comparative analysis of editorials, opinion articles and letters to the editor published in the selected newspapers in order to highlight subjects and themes in connection with the image of the Other and the Self and show the differences and similarities in the processing of information in both the American and British press.

After graduating as a teacher in Belgium,
the author worked in the financial sector in Luxembourg before returning to teaching. She has a PhD in Foreign Languages and
Literature.